I've played games where these kind of 'home-field' advantages work out to help balance by preventing pushes. I can actually see how it might apply to Supreme commander, given that the 'anti-rush' measure is usually the commander, and the commander is limited in naval combat. That being said, it's important to know that this exists, so I thankyou for the visibility, while being unable to comment on the balance implications. Thanks.

https://forum.faforever.com/topic/6372/feature-request-tmm-matching-change-don-t-put-foes-on-same-team

Nomads is still imbal and people already complain a lot about the current 4 factions.

Yeah that change was shitty and the option to deactivate it doesn't work properly, it also deactivates the ringing of the mexes.

@drpatrickstar said in Unassisting one factory with onather shouldn't kill current cue: So if I have a factory assisting another one, and I want to upgrade the assisting factory to t2, if I cancel the assist order directly the current order gets cancelled and the buildtime and resources wasted. Unfortunately that command doesn't help. The "stop and cancel all factory orders except the current one" command tells said factory to finish whatever it is currently building, then do what you tell it to. In the example you gave, the command I mentioned ("stop and cancel all factory orders except the current one") would have the assisting factory complete its current build, so what you descibed : "current order gets cancelled and the buildtime and resources wasted" wouldn't happen. It would, instead, finish its current build (the one it inherited from the factory it was assisting) before starting its T2 upgrade.

I forgot that this was even a feature, and now I'm excited to try it again.

@Balthazar is the maintainer, we could start by asking him

Thanks a lot for everything you've done for the coommunity Rowey!

@closed said in Status of Game? It sucks!: And I don't know if it is only me, but when I quit FAF, it stays most of the time in the task manager and I have to end the task. Maybe this is worth mentioning, but the problems my (closed) playgroup has had seems to also involve the ICE adapters, and people not being able to quit the game properly without a black screen and involving Task Manager. We play tonight, so I guess we have to cross our fingers that some reinstalls we did help.

Isn't FAF logo just an edited EA logo?

I face the same issue, and occasionally, a worse one. Sometimes my idle engineers icon turns a considerable portion of my screen black. You either Ctrl + K the unit or gift it over and have it gifted back. It used to happen quite often, but it's a little more rare, now, thankfully. Still occasionally happens, though. ~ Stryker

You need to make sure you trade well in battles. Make sure your rally points are not trickling units into groups of Mantis who have got across the map faster and got the numerical advantage. It's general advise for all factions but against Cybran all the more important as it can snowball that much faster. You also need to have good Intel and play zoomed out so you can intercept run bys. I think playing Cybran is more forgiving at T1 because you can react later and Mantis speed will help out. You can also finish facs which are half built (cos the engineer building them died) using any nearby mantis. This makes it easier to expand quickly.

because active ladder players banned

the client window not being "captured" by the mouse cursor glitch is an old one, i use my client minimized a bit so i can have a browser open next to it (equal sizes 1920x1080), if i stretch the client a small amount then i can grab the title bar and move the client around, however if i stretch it too much little squares of desktop wallpaper show up in the client window, this has been happening for a long time (more than a year?). There is another possible w7 glitch where the chat list is broken into halves, so i have some guys A-Z, and then another bunch of guys also A-Z, and then the chat only guys, this goes back to about client version 23, but i'm not too worried about either of these glitches tbh

based

The AI might not have sufficient information about the game state or the opponent's actions to make strategic decisions. Without accurate data, it may default to a conservative approach to minimize risks.

That would help too, just to make sure we understand the context.

i am