FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Who owns the rights to the SC:FA source code?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    32 Posts 16 Posters 3.3k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • O Offline
      OtisTDrunk @nflanders
      last edited by

      @nflanders I heard it was my fathers brothers older cousins room mate that obtained the code by bar room kumite brawl fight! Some still say he is still Champion and holder of the code "The Final Boss If You Will." His weakness is a Bionic Elbow To The Head or Dempsey Roll......The Bionic Dempsey Roll Elbow!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
      • nflandersN Offline
        nflanders @RedX
        last edited by

        @redx said in Who owns the rights to the SC:FA source code?:

        Maybe I am not fully aware of the economic forces behind this franchise, but I cannot imagine there being enough of a market to justify remastering this game.

        sc1_vs_sc2.png

        Interesting fact, a lot of people talked about how terrible Supremme Commander 2 turned out, but if you look at the graphs, the popularity of SC:FA was not much more than SC2. If you look at the graph, this was the case until approximately June 2022. I'm wondering what's causing this online growth in SC:FA in 2022?

        Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JipJ Offline
          Jip
          last edited by

          We are πŸ™‚

          The client can register itself as the game, bumping the numbers in Steam.

          A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • nine2N Offline
            nine2
            last edited by

            We wonder this too - why specifically such a huge jump in a short amount of time?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BlackYpsB Offline
              BlackYps
              last edited by

              that was when the feature got introduced in the client. Before that the faf players were invisible on steam

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                Sheikah
                last edited by

                That is when the FAF client started allowing people with steam installed on their machine to report their FAF playtime as scfa playtime

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • nine2N Offline
                  nine2
                  last edited by

                  Thanks!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • nflandersN Offline
                    nflanders @RedX
                    last edited by nflanders

                    @redx said in Who owns the rights to the SC:FA source code?:

                    Maybe I am not fully aware of the economic forces behind this franchise, but I cannot imagine there being enough of a market to justify remastering this game.

                    In some ways you are right, the game is really dead and no one plays it. If you look at the graphs, online SC:FA is equal to online SopCom 2. So why will the publisher remaster SC1 or SC:FA? Why doesn't the publisher make a remaster of SupCom 2? The publisher doesn’t care what you personally like, he needs financial indicators.
                    Why do you need to make a remaster or sequel for SC1:FA? Why not SC2? Maybe more people are playing SC:FA? No, no more, according to Steam charts: https://steamcharts.com/cmp/9420,40100#All

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Z Offline
                      ZooDoo4U @nflanders
                      last edited by ZooDoo4U

                      This post is deleted!
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • nflandersN Offline
                        nflanders @nflanders
                        last edited by nflanders

                        UPDATE thx for @dragonite
                        Screenshot_2023-12-10-18-20-43-115_com.linkedin.android.jpg Screenshot_2023-12-10-18-20-48-914_com.linkedin.android.jpg Screenshot_2023-12-10-18-20-54-111_com.linkedin.android.jpg Screenshot_2023-12-10-18-21-12-544_com.linkedin.android.jpg Screenshot_2023-12-10-18-21-31-464_com.linkedin.android.jpg

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • RoweyR Offline
                          Rowey
                          last edited by

                          The fact that nomads is mentioned and is not even part of the main game and is not even complete/under active develop so this wasn't the best thing to even bring up. Something like this should really Go though the community manager/promotion team/ associate as this is been asked in the behalf of faf

                          "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" - Spock

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • JipJ Offline
                            Jip
                            last edited by

                            (it is from January, 2020)

                            A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                            • veteranasheV Offline
                              veteranashe
                              last edited by

                              So.........

                              IndexLibrorumI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • IndexLibrorumI Offline
                                IndexLibrorum Global Moderator @veteranashe
                                last edited by

                                @veteranashe So at the time it was under active development and much more hyped, so a lot less strange to mention in the email.

                                "Design is an iterative process. The required number of iterations is one more than the number you have currently done. This is true at any point in time."

                                See all my projects:

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post