FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Talking about the Fatty

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
    94 Posts 35 Posters 8.3k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ComradeStrykerC Offline
      ComradeStryker
      last edited by

      I suggested that the Shield HP and the Base Unit's HP be swapped - It would still have the same HP as it does right now, but it'll
      work slightly differently over time.


      ~ Stryker

      ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • veteranasheV Offline
        veteranashe
        last edited by

        Makes me think how much more useful the czar is after dropping the HP and adding a sheild

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DeribusD Offline
          Deribus Global Moderator
          last edited by

          I want fatty to be able to toss it's shield like a giant curling stone.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • F Offline
            Fichom
            last edited by Fichom

            If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

            Or give it staggered fire, higher arc, larger scatter and larger damage radius - effectively, a small-scale Scathis. The better scatter + damage radius will make it harder to dodge, though you might want to nudge it's alpha then so it doesn't just wipe non-experimentals from existence.

            Or just turn it into a MAA experimental, and have it's main guns able to fire at air targets lol.

            Actually you could give it like, in addition to being able to produce T3 land, the ability to produce up to T2 air as well. If paired with I hope soon coming fix to the mobile factories working even when on move, you could churn out some bombers or gunships to help it against incoming direct-fire experimentals.

            B ZeldafanboyZ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 5
            • JipJ Offline
              Jip
              last edited by

              If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

              I love this idea 😄

              A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B Offline
                Blodir @Fichom
                last edited by

                @fichom said in Talking about the Fatty:

                If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                I also love this idea B) I guess you'd maybe add a little bit of range to the units being transported or something so that it makes sense to use them to augment the fatboy. Sounds like a lot of fun to pimp ur fatboy with different setups

                • t3 maa and shields vs strat snipes
                • t3 mobile arty for even more bombardment
                • percies for direct fire engagements
                • stealth field!
                • spearheads? shield disruptors?
                • sniper bots

                Honestly if that was implemented I'd also like to see it become much cheaper (with reduced stats to compensate). T3 armies are kinda trash atm, so being able to load them into fatboys to become semi experimentals would make uef work better aggressively in exp stage.

                TheWeakieT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • X Offline
                  Xayo
                  last edited by Xayo

                  I agree with t3 land being "kinda trash atm" (compared to t4), and think this whole Fatboy discussion is merely a symptom of this.

                  Things were a little better before the GC buff fix. Back then percies only had to be afraid of Chickens. Now they also need to be afraid of GCs. So against 2/4 factions, t3 land will just brutally lose against t4. Cybran can at least somewhat compete with their monkey/mega, but the fatty just can't.

                  Changing the T3 vs T4 land dynamic to the point where percies can at least somewhat hold the line might be better than changing the fatty.

                  F waffelzNoobW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • F Offline
                    Fichom @Xayo
                    last edited by

                    @xayo said in Talking about the Fatty:

                    Things were a little better before the GC buff fix. Back then percies only had to be afraid of Chickens. Now they also need to be afraid of GCs. So against 2/4 factions, t3 land will just brutally lose against t4. Cybran can at least somewhat compete with their monkey/mega, but the fatty just can't.

                    Well to make the GC not as overwhelming vs T3, you could mark some units to be 'heavy' a.k.a. not-tractorable. Say to all 'heavy' T3 land units of each faction - Percy, Brick, Othuum and Harbs.

                    But that's for another thread, this one should focus on the Fatboy

                    @blodir said in Talking about the Fatty:

                    I also love this idea B) I guess you'd maybe add a little bit of range to the units being transported or something so that it makes sense to use them to augment the fatboy.

                    I'd actually not augment the carried units (if this ever came to fruition). Just leave them as is. You already pointed one pretty busted thing, it having stealth, but don't forget that in multi-team games you could have it quite busted. Using Sera Athanah T3 mobile shield instead of para, a Sparky to get jamming/Deceiver for stealth, bunch of firepower. Like adding 10 Percies would already make it very strong. Or a combo of Percies and Titans, to help with clearing spam.

                    What's more, I'd give it like 2 slots in the front, and 3 on each side. That way you don't get the benefits of all the units at once, unless they are support units (like shield or AA).

                    F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ComradeStrykerC Offline
                      ComradeStryker
                      last edited by

                      Why not reduce its overall stats by about 10-15%?
                      This would include the Resource Costs, Shield HP, Base Unit HP, DPS, Build Times, and more.

                      Granted, this won't directly fix its issue being that it doesn't quite have a firm role... but...
                      It could help ease it into a slightly better spot.


                      ~ Stryker

                      ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ZeldafanboyZ Offline
                        Zeldafanboy @Fichom
                        last edited by Zeldafanboy

                        @fichom said in Talking about the Fatty:

                        If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                        Allow static structures to be built on hardpoints, so you can build static flak, TML, T2 arty, T2 PD, or even Ravagers for the Fatboy

                        put the xbox units in the game pls u_u

                        veteranasheV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • TheWeakieT Offline
                          TheWeakie Balance Team @Blodir
                          last edited by

                          @blodir said in Talking about the Fatty:

                          T3 armies are kinda trash

                          Wutface

                          Also about gc claws

                          https://github.com/FAForever/fa/pull/4442

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • veteranasheV Offline
                            veteranashe @Zeldafanboy
                            last edited by

                            @zeldafanboy said in Talking about the Fatty:

                            @fichom said in Talking about the Fatty:

                            If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                            Allow static structures to be built on hardpoints, so you can build static flak, TML, T2 arty, T2 PD, or even Ravagers for the Fatboy

                            This was considered before fa came out, and the consensus was that it lowered the HP to kill the unit since you can take out hard points first to lower it's effectiveness.

                            I do like making the fatty a transport that units can fire from. Make it that the units can go underwater with them for an amphibious attack.

                            ZeldafanboyZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ZeldafanboyZ Offline
                              Zeldafanboy @veteranashe
                              last edited by

                              @veteranashe said in Talking about the Fatty:

                              This was considered before fa came out, and the consensus was that it lowered the HP to kill the unit since you can take out hard points first to lower it's effectiveness.

                              Then give the fatboy one hardpoint that can accept one equivalent structure via an upgrade, meaning it wont have its own hp pool

                              put the xbox units in the game pls u_u

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • F Offline
                                Fichom @Fichom
                                last edited by

                                @fichom said in Talking about the Fatty:

                                What's more, I'd give it like 2 slots in the front, and 3 on each side. That way you don't get the benefits of all the units at once, unless they are support units (like shield or AA).

                                Ofc, I messed up my math, 2 + 3 + 3 = 10 in my brain somehow. I meant 4 front, 3 on each side, duh!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • SaverS Offline
                                  Saver
                                  last edited by

                                  Hello everyone 🙂 I think the topic is great because I love Fatboy. The point about the slots sounds very interesting. Since I am unfortunately not a good player myself, I created a mod for the Fatboy, which received TMD and other weapon modes. If I have time again I would try to implement the suggestion to see how it works. However, the balance part is and remains very demanding. I wish the balance team every success 🙂 sy for my bad english 😉

                                  K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • waffelzNoobW Offline
                                    waffelzNoob @Xayo
                                    last edited by

                                    @xayo you forget snipers. Percies arent relevant to 2/4 factions even before T4

                                    frick snoops!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Sladow-NoobS Sladow-Noob referenced this topic on
                                    • Sladow-NoobS Sladow-Noob referenced this topic on
                                    • Sladow-NoobS Sladow-Noob referenced this topic on
                                    • K Offline
                                      Krapougnak @Saver
                                      last edited by

                                      @saver Hi, I have been playing with your mods, specially the new fatboy. I was wondering, would it be possible to give him back the napalm launcher weapon on his back ? Maybe as an enhancement ? As the model looks weird with the missile launcher on top and no missile weapon whatsoever. Thanks.

                                      SaverS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • SaverS Offline
                                        Saver @Krapougnak
                                        last edited by

                                        @krapougnak Hi, so yes I could. However, I don't want to let the units become too strong. They are not intended to destroy the normal game, but rather to add variety and complement it. I also gave the UEF a mech that can form a good front in combination with the Fatboy.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K Offline
                                          Krapougnak
                                          last edited by

                                          OK I understand. But maybe as an enhancement with adequate costs that would give the Fatboy another wepon option. Otherwise just modify the model and get rid of the napalm turret because just now it looks weird, a weapon turret without any weapon on it.

                                          Also, fantastic job on the Atlantis and very nice model for the Enforcer.

                                          SaverS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • SaverS Offline
                                            Saver @Krapougnak
                                            last edited by

                                            @krapougnak THX 🙂

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post