FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Talking about the Fatty

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
    94 Posts 35 Posters 8.4k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Sladow-NoobS Offline
      Sladow-Noob @Pearl12
      last edited by

      @pearl12
      Don't forget the apm of your opponent is limited as well. If we talk about high ranks, then it's only a few clicks.
      If we talk about lower ranked lobbies, then it could be more intense, however the opponent doesn't realise all the possibilities to kill the fatty. It basically cancels out if you understand what I mean?
      Explanation might not be the best here, but speaking from experience low ranks tend to focus on 1-2 things at the time so it's not a problem.

      Inactive.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Pearl12P Offline
        Pearl12
        last edited by

        Right, theoretically I am a similar rank and thus have similar micro abilities as my opponent, but if I'm UEF and they're Sera, they don't have to use those extra clicks because their exps don't need to be micro'd as much. The fatty almost always requires micro to use properly. Monkeys, Chickens, and GCs rarely do. Or at least, they are much more forgiving.

        I just don't think "it's balanced if you micro it" is the argument we should be leaning on. Isn't that just a skill filter?

        Sladow-NoobS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • FtXCommandoF Offline
          FtXCommando
          last edited by

          For sera t3 land to be decent you need to babysit it so this is a weird argument since the UEF guy doesnt need to babysit his sniper blob

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N Offline
            Nooby @Tex
            last edited by

            @tex said in Talking about the Fatty:

            Vanilla fatty was a monster. It packed those big boy summit cannons. Shell damage and speed was massive. Dps was way higher even with like, 1/4th the ROF. I miss vanilla fatty. It would still suffer from the same problems but it was way cooler.

            Why not half its ROF and double its shell damage?

            I think this would suit the faction more

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • veteranasheV Offline
              veteranashe
              last edited by

              I just watched a cast of Rambo coms dodging around half the fatty shells so that might be a bad idea.

              TheVVheelboyT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • TheVVheelboyT Offline
                TheVVheelboy @veteranashe
                last edited by

                @veteranashe
                It can be also accompanied by buff to the shell velocity. Tripple the damage, lower the rof, at the very least double the shell velocity and you have a beast of a unit. Switch the explosions to the summit one and you have a unit that now also have a good sound/visual punch to it.

                And if going this route one could also experiment with changing the firing randomness to make it more of a precision artillery piece rather than current one that is more about shelling your opponent with thousand small shells.

                Also another thing I would look at is small buffs to the riot guns. Giving them a little bit bigger turret Yaw could make them much more reliable to use.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Sladow-NoobS Offline
                  Sladow-Noob @Pearl12
                  last edited by

                  @pearl12 said in Talking about the Fatty:

                  Right, theoretically I am a similar rank and thus have similar micro abilities as my opponent, but if I'm UEF and they're Sera, they don't have to use those extra clicks because their exps don't need to be micro'd as much. The fatty almost always requires micro to use properly. Monkeys, Chickens, and GCs rarely do. Or at least, they are much more forgiving.

                  There is a chance I simply misunderstood it, but your opponent indeed has to micro as well. He walks chicken into your fatty and you retreat - His chicken will die.
                  He also has to pay attention and react to your movements, otherwise his units just get hit for free -> I would actually say your opponent (If you're the one with the fatty) has to use more apm due to finding mistakes in your micro so he can push and once he was in range and needs to get out, he has to run in zig-zag as well

                  Inactive.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                  • ComradeStrykerC Offline
                    ComradeStryker
                    last edited by ComradeStryker

                    I have to agree with your post.

                    The Fatboy is a great unit, perfect in the right conditions, but those conditions need to be near-perfect for it to be effective, otherwise, it will die quite quickly...
                    As for other Exps, they are much more forgiving and have a wider 'effectiveness' range, if that makes sense.


                    ~ Stryker

                    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • CaptainKlutzC Offline
                      CaptainKlutz
                      last edited by

                      93a3f768-4a54-49c8-a3e3-5b43ff469436-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 7
                      • TheWeakieT Offline
                        TheWeakie Balance Team
                        last edited by

                        Yes.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • ZeldafanboyZ Offline
                          Zeldafanboy
                          last edited by

                          an opinion can only be correct if it fits in a single sentence

                          put the xbox units in the game pls u_u

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • veteranasheV Offline
                            veteranashe
                            last edited by

                            +1

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                            • ComradeStrykerC ComradeStryker referenced this topic on
                            • P Offline
                              PiGuy
                              last edited by

                              I concur with the idea of buffing the shell speed and allowing it to move while building units. Personally also like the idea of giving it a personal shield and buffing its general HP but those might be too much. Maybe ever so slightly buff its movement speed as well?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ComradeStrykerC Offline
                                ComradeStryker
                                last edited by

                                I suggested that the Shield HP and the Base Unit's HP be swapped - It would still have the same HP as it does right now, but it'll
                                work slightly differently over time.


                                ~ Stryker

                                ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • veteranasheV Offline
                                  veteranashe
                                  last edited by

                                  Makes me think how much more useful the czar is after dropping the HP and adding a sheild

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DeribusD Offline
                                    Deribus Global Moderator
                                    last edited by

                                    I want fatty to be able to toss it's shield like a giant curling stone.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • F Offline
                                      Fichom
                                      last edited by Fichom

                                      If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                                      Or give it staggered fire, higher arc, larger scatter and larger damage radius - effectively, a small-scale Scathis. The better scatter + damage radius will make it harder to dodge, though you might want to nudge it's alpha then so it doesn't just wipe non-experimentals from existence.

                                      Or just turn it into a MAA experimental, and have it's main guns able to fire at air targets lol.

                                      Actually you could give it like, in addition to being able to produce T3 land, the ability to produce up to T2 air as well. If paired with I hope soon coming fix to the mobile factories working even when on move, you could churn out some bombers or gunships to help it against incoming direct-fire experimentals.

                                      B ZeldafanboyZ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 5
                                      • JipJ Offline
                                        Jip
                                        last edited by

                                        If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                                        I love this idea 😄

                                        A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • B Offline
                                          Blodir @Fichom
                                          last edited by

                                          @fichom said in Talking about the Fatty:

                                          If you want to explore the 'experimental' side of things as Jip was mentioning, maybe give the Fatboy 10 or so 'slots' where he can 'transport' (equip) units, which could still work when 'mounted'. Say it can equip 2 Parashields, 4 Mercies and 4 Cougars - then it becomes a mobile fortress equipped with additional shields, fire-power and very strong anti-air.

                                          I also love this idea B) I guess you'd maybe add a little bit of range to the units being transported or something so that it makes sense to use them to augment the fatboy. Sounds like a lot of fun to pimp ur fatboy with different setups

                                          • t3 maa and shields vs strat snipes
                                          • t3 mobile arty for even more bombardment
                                          • percies for direct fire engagements
                                          • stealth field!
                                          • spearheads? shield disruptors?
                                          • sniper bots

                                          Honestly if that was implemented I'd also like to see it become much cheaper (with reduced stats to compensate). T3 armies are kinda trash atm, so being able to load them into fatboys to become semi experimentals would make uef work better aggressively in exp stage.

                                          TheWeakieT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • X Offline
                                            Xayo
                                            last edited by Xayo

                                            I agree with t3 land being "kinda trash atm" (compared to t4), and think this whole Fatboy discussion is merely a symptom of this.

                                            Things were a little better before the GC buff fix. Back then percies only had to be afraid of Chickens. Now they also need to be afraid of GCs. So against 2/4 factions, t3 land will just brutally lose against t4. Cybran can at least somewhat compete with their monkey/mega, but the fatty just can't.

                                            Changing the T3 vs T4 land dynamic to the point where percies can at least somewhat hold the line might be better than changing the fatty.

                                            F waffelzNoobW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post