FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Developers Iteration III of 2023

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    138 Posts 33 Posters 279.0k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Z Offline
      zhanghm18 @MostLostNoob
      last edited by

      @mostlostnoob Ok, I'll create a new post in the map section

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JipJ Offline
        Jip
        last edited by

        We're now working on making the map generator support the new shaders, in particular BlackYps and Sheikah are working on that. You can see it here:

        • https://github.com/FAForever/Neroxis-Map-Generator/pull/351

        A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • SaverS Offline
          Saver
          last edited by

          Thank you again for the great features. You are great 🙂

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            DonSailieri
            last edited by

            Thank you, this is great stuff!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JipJ Offline
              Jip
              last edited by Jip

              I've updated the post with the changelog to include a changelog for the hotfix to be released next Saturday.

              For those that are reading this but remain silent, I encourage you to provide feedback on the patch(es). Either through Discord or the forums works fine. We're always open to feedback and we'll try to fix bugs that you may encounter.

              A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
              • C Offline
                CocaineDiesel
                last edited by

                For mobile factories, would it be possible to:

                1. Populate the construction queue UI of the parent unit with the child factory.
                2. Shunt any orders given via that queue to the child factory (including repeat build etc.)
                3. Remove all the child factory selection bone-throwing, and have it be a silent attachment.

                Child factories for carriers already pass the units they create back to the parent, so there's some linking between them?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JipJ Offline
                  Jip
                  last edited by Jip

                  The engine is not made to pass orders to arbitrary units. It only works for units that are currently in your selection. We'd need to hack in suggestions (1) and (2) through construction.lua and that is a file that is, uuhh - not friendly towards developers. The fact that it (the file) even works at this point is a miracle.

                  Child factories for carriers already pass the units they create back to the parent, so there's some linking between them?

                  This is in the sim, where the external factory unit passes the events to the main unit. That triggers the animations and effects and cleans them up again.

                  I assume that with (3) you want the factory unit to become unselectable. If that is so, then you'd also remove the ability to set rally points.

                  A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JipJ Offline
                    Jip
                    last edited by

                    The hotfix is released and the capping behavior is restored to (almost) the old set of features. Make sure to check the game options, they're now split out in separate options. You can read up about it on Github

                    A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Z Offline
                      ZooDoo4U
                      last edited by

                      Might be me but the latest changes seem more than annoying and breaks the game play. Units like the tempest being able to be construction units, the game has always allowed and had them, why fix, change or break it now? Other notable change the unit hover to build mass extractors and hydro, and the latest removal double clicking an engineer on a mass to get storage around it. Can understand the problems with the "hover" ability but not for the dblclick to place storage. Could be wrong but thought the release notes mentioned fixes for game stability... How about not messing with the game and put it back to the original... The game got popular and i never remember having as many crashes and desyns as it appears there are now a days...

                      JipJ FtXCommandoF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JipJ Offline
                        Jip @ZooDoo4U
                        last edited by

                        @zoodoo4u said in Developers Iteration III of 2023:

                        and the latest removal double clicking an engineer on a mass to get storage around it.

                        Please check the game options, as mentioned in the changelog. They're all there. But now fully customizable, to your liking:

                        63612142-5c40-4419-84ae-d1ed3ae1968a-image.png

                        @zoodoo4u said in Developers Iteration III of 2023:

                        Might be me but the latest changes seem more than annoying and breaks the game play. Units like the tempest being able to be construction units, the game has always allowed and had them, why fix, change or break it now?

                        What is broken about this? The community wanted proper functioning mobile factories, and now they have them.

                        @zoodoo4u said in Developers Iteration III of 2023:

                        How about not messing with the game and put it back to the original... The game got popular and i never remember having as many crashes and desyns as it appears there are now a days...

                        Desyncs are not related to patches, but likely due to (sim) mods being out of sync. If you experience a crash then please enable the FAF Debugger:

                        61103f90-effc-4213-a520-27868c71f3ae-image.png

                        And report back with your logs. Personally my game never crashes, and I know that it is the same for many others. The most common culprit for game crashes is sound errors. When you share your game logs then maybe we can find out why your game crashes so often 🙂

                        A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • FtXCommandoF Offline
                          FtXCommando @ZooDoo4U
                          last edited by FtXCommando

                          @zoodoo4u said in Developers Iteration III of 2023:

                          How about not messing with the game and put it back to the original...

                          Which original? The t1 mass fab farmer gameplay of supcom, the t1 transport com bomb gameplay of steam fa, or the litany of things such as -10 asf fights/invulnerable ACU exploits/resource generation exploits in preceding FAF versions?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                          • veteranasheV Offline
                            veteranashe
                            last edited by

                            We should allow com napping

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C Offline
                              CocaineDiesel @Jip
                              last edited by

                              @jip

                              As an intermediate thought, what about a button to select the child factory (like pod platforms have)? Would that solve (what I assume) is the problem with the Czar/Tempest, where there's not a good place to put the factory at the "back" of the unit?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • JipJ Offline
                                Jip
                                last edited by Jip

                                I tried to implement that, but to no avail. Not sure why the implementation of the pods work, and not sure why mine did not work

                                edit: missed your second sentence.

                                Tempest does have a separate factory unit at the back. CZAR doesn't have a back or front, and you're right - that is why it doesn't have it at the moment.

                                A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • veteranasheV Offline
                                  veteranashe
                                  last edited by

                                  Czar has a center

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • N Offline
                                    Nex
                                    last edited by

                                    Imagine clicking at the center of a Czar and not selecting the unit to move😆

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • veteranasheV Offline
                                      veteranashe
                                      last edited by

                                      Imagine clicking the back of the Fatboy and it doesn't move

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                                      • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                                      • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                                      • JipJ Offline
                                        Jip
                                        last edited by

                                        Another hotfix is released. It primarily fixes how beam weapons interact with tech 1 and tech 2 naval units. You can learn more about it on Github

                                        A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                                        • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                                        • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                                        • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                                        • R Offline
                                          robotcat
                                          last edited by robotcat

                                          when will the pbr shaders be released?

                                          MostLostNoobM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • MostLostNoobM Offline
                                            MostLostNoob @robotcat
                                            last edited by

                                            @robotcat Those will be part of the next upcoming Developers Iteration IV: https://forum.faforever.com/topic/6514/developers-iteration-iv-of-2023?_=1697543476323

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post