@jip M28 uses a semi-decentralised approach but I don't think it's what FtX is referring to - i.e. M28 will still consider building units, and will just consider within a localised area whether to upgrade a mex / build storage / get reclaim (as opposed to trying to get a T3 mex as fast as possible).

Im refering to whenever I am using keys to pause a mex or something. The input lag that happens which requires me to press it a few more times to make sure its correctly paused. The same thing when I use the infinte build key binding on factories

I don't like early raid as i don't have the apm to take care of my build order and take care of that single bomber/lab killing my engi

@arkangel_ Thank you! Very helpful.

The short down of API was weeks ago - In discord is a status channel that tells you when API is down/up. It detects any changes automatically.

@amygdala said in Bug in custom games previews: @redhotchilipeper afaik its a known bug and alreay fixed in the next client version. you can try the alpha client (aka pre-release client for test purposes) here: https://github.com/FAForever/downlords-faf-client/releasesmonkey mart Okay, I guess it makes sense, and I appreciate the clarification.

@magge said in Recall button: That is a good suggestion, which you can add as a request to the GitHub project, when it has not already had been created there: https://github.com/FAForever/fa/issuesbasketball stars If anyone is abusing the current implantation, you should just report it. I have not seen any report about it so far in the last weeks. @espiranto said in Recall button: I will also start doing this every 0.3 seconds I would highly recommend not doing it. As it is already severely constrained by the current implementation, I don't see how you could ever use that to compel it as a requirement. In the absence of evidence that we have already broken it

i dont know if the map gen already works like this, but maybe there could be shematic presets of proven map patterns which you can modify trough certain variables. Dual Gap Style (sorry), setons style, plateu corners, plateu mids, river, lake whatever. boiled down to its main characteristics which are proven trough 1000s of matches to be a gud map. e.g. its basically canis but looks flat and empty like crater at first. then let map gen do its magic in modifiying it to a new map with the choosen parameters. it would somehow defy the whole point of having a mapgen but in theory the aim would be get new but more predictable outcomes. ofc the possibility to create maps out of nothing should still be the main feature.

I'd second this... making it movable. It pretty much halts all access to the menus.

@Jip @crispweed I see that the latest commit from Jip to Dev branch "fixed" capitalization cursor -> Cursor, but do we know if it was even a bug to begin with (Jip check reply above from crispweed)?

you can always downgrade the difficutly, hard is supposed to be hard and for now, it's the default difficutly.

i have made an issue on github for this thankyou for reporting it

@arkangel_ Abhor

Penalizing higher rated players is a healthier solution than boosting lower rated ones. Otherwise you'll have new players learn stuff that won't be possible anymore without a 10% energy production buff or whatever.

the idea is not very

Being zoomed out also matters more with higher rating

There was a bug in the game code that allowed instantly finish structures, some of those are in the leaderboards. Modded games don't show up in the leaderboards. Only game with default settings.

@karlshady said in mass spending: As an avid player of FAF, I agree with the sentiment that mass spending can lead to an unfair advantage in gameplay. While having a large collection of units and resources can certainly be helpful, it can also create a lopsided playing field where newer or more casual players are at a disadvantage. Found you, ChatGPT.