FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Patch 3732 - 3735

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    63 Posts 21 Posters 8.9k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FtXCommandoF Offline
      FtXCommando
      last edited by

      Swiftwinds have always lost to mass equivalent value in ints.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        TheManWithBeans
        last edited by

        Is there a reason why reclaim doesn't die to splash damage anymore?

        JipJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JipJ Offline
          Jip @TheManWithBeans
          last edited by

          @themanwithbeans said in Patch 3732:

          Is there a reason why reclaim doesn't die to splash damage anymore?

          Replay ID 🙂

          A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

          TheWeakieT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Chenbro101C Offline
            Chenbro101
            last edited by

            Hi. Don't know if this bug has to do with this patch but my first game on the new patch had an instance where bricks didn't fire at t1 units in range because there were some pillars just outside their range.
            https://replay.faforever.com/16864415 at about 25:30 to 25:55

            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T Offline
              thecore @Chenbro101
              last edited by

              @chenbro101 I think I remember seeing my T2 PDF (seraphim) not attacking enemy metal extractors. Maybe this could be related?

              Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JipJ Offline
                Jip
                last edited by

                If a target is right outside of a unit it can prepare to fire at that unit. This is a scanning radius. It is balance related to change that.

                A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • TheWeakieT Offline
                  TheWeakie Balance Team @Jip
                  last edited by TheWeakie

                  @jip said in Patch 3732:

                  Replay ID 🙂

                  https://replay.faforever.com/16874043

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JipJ Offline
                    Jip
                    last edited by

                    Released another fix - game version 3735. See the second post of this topic for the changelog.

                    A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                    • K Offline
                      Katharsas
                      last edited by Katharsas

                      Wasn't the general problem that e-dependent buildings continue to use 100% e even when they are not working because of a stall? Which is completely different from how mass works?

                      Would it be possible to disable a building when it stalls and start a timer, so after like 5 seconds it tries to turn itself on again (and you cannot turn it on sooner)? This would still punish you for uncontrolled e stall, but it would punish continued stall less than before and it would make mass-fabs auto-balanced by getting deactivated randomly.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JipJ Offline
                        Jip
                        last edited by

                        I think you're responding in the wrong topic 🙂 .

                        A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • J Offline
                          jcvjcvjcvjcv
                          last edited by

                          Was it also intended for a "boosted" shield to show an inaccurate bar of it's shield hp?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post