FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Balance Discussion
    100 Posts 41 Posters 8.5k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • maudlin27M Offline
      maudlin27 @wikingest
      last edited by

      @wikingest Your focus just seems to be on how good it is on a single map, Setons - there are other maps played and it’s performance is significantly worse on maps that aren’t large with spread out mexes.

      Even if it was considered very powerful on one map (I dont think that has been established yet in this thread), I dont think balance should be based on a single map anyway. For example the alternative extreme would be if I said how novax needs a big buff because it’s near-useless on Astro Craters.

      M27AI and M28AI developer; Devlogs and more general AI development guide:
      https://forum.faforever.com/topic/2373/ai-development-guide-and-m27ai-v71-devlog
      https://forum.faforever.com/topic/5331/m28ai-devlog-v130

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • W Offline
        wikingest
        last edited by

        @maudlin27 Unit that is not an obligation to build, should be balanced on its best map. If it is too weak in other conditions, than it does not matter, people do not need to build it. But if it is op in one map, then the game is "broken".

        For example. Lets say that Mavor is useless in one-v-one game on open 5 by 5 km map. Lets make it ten times cheaper, so it would become useful. Now imagine what would happen on game in general, on other maps, when players notice that mavor is ten times cheaper and all other prices (also gameenders) are the same. What would happen to FAF.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • FtXCommandoF Offline
          FtXCommando
          last edited by

          Sentons is fine for novax because the the only thing sentons brings that is “unique” for novax to take into account is the utility helping with late game navy fights. Basically any decent big teamgame map is going to have mexes similar to sentons or even more spread out. Novax just isn’t anything more than a nuisance in these games when properly handled.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V Offline
            Vinyl117
            last edited by Vinyl117

            I feel giving the smd a toggle to shoot down a novax is reasonable. The missiles only cost like 3.6k vs the satellites 10k to replace. If its something you can turn on then you can't use them to overwhelm the smd either and since its not economic to build smds all over the map for most of the game it protects the core base and still lets the extent mass be threatened. The sat can do its job to harass outer mexes, defend against pushes and even be an early scout.

            Addendum: If needed you could even buff the sat to compensate, drop its reload from 20 secs to 16 to make it more useful as a defensive unit or to kill far units and buildings. this would raise its dps to ~300ish.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
            • veteranasheV Offline
              veteranashe @Zeldafanboy
              last edited by

              @zeldafanboy said in Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.:

              Sad to see so many antiVaxers, people believe anything they see on social media nowadays

              That goes both ways buddy

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • CheeseBerryC Offline
                CheeseBerry
                last edited by

                The real question though: Is "nerfing the No-Vax" a pro or anti vax stance? xd

                ZeldafanboyZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • ZeldafanboyZ Offline
                  Zeldafanboy @CheeseBerry
                  last edited by

                  @cheeseberry

                  AntiVax=anti Novax= pro nerf

                  put the xbox units in the game pls u_u

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • L Offline
                    Lowki
                    last edited by

                    Nerf Novax when?

                    I just played a game where the opponent build 8 novax then just whent around the map executing coms at will.

                    I like some of the suggestions such as

                    reducing the damage the further away the sat gets from the station

                    increaseing cost

                    or things like limiting the range or making it just an intel unit like the eye for aeon.

                    but something needs to be done about it, in my humble opinion.

                    Sladow-NoobS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Sladow-NoobS Offline
                      Sladow-Noob @Lowki
                      last edited by Sladow-Noob

                      @lowki said in Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.:

                      I just played a game where the opponent build 8 novax then just whent around the map executing coms at will.

                      Me when my opponent invests nearly 300k mass (30-35% more than a mavor) into novaxes and actually wins the game by being allowed to do that

                      Inactive.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • TheVVheelboyT Offline
                        TheVVheelboy
                        last edited by

                        Ayo, my opponent invested more than Paragon worth of mass to finish the game. Please nerf for there was nothing we could do against it!

                        If you wanna make a change, then it would be decent to include something more than what you wrote.
                        Even a replay ID....

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • L Offline
                          Lowki
                          last edited by

                          @TheWeakieNoob @Endranii

                          I get the = mass argument however mavor doesnt have 100% accuracy, vision and omni and even the mavor doesnt have unlimited range limited to 4000 I think, mavor also needs adjecent t3 pgens to make it fire faster wich means its easier to kill, so 8 novax is far better value for money than a mavor, wouldnt you agree?

                          F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • FtXCommandoF Offline
                            FtXCommando
                            last edited by

                            mavor range is functionally unlimited in 20x20, faf doesn't factor in larger map sizes for balance considerations. It's also way easier to kill 8 novaxes than a mavor jwith t3 pgens just out of the sheer size of the area you need to shield. Mavor also has large aoe which is extremely essential for actually breaking bases. You're better off with 1-2 novaxes followed by t3 arty so the novaxes can take advantage of downed shields to snipe low hp structures like the shields or an smd.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • F Offline
                              Firv @Lowki
                              last edited by

                              @lowki said in Novax needs to be nerfed, here's why.:

                              @TheWeakieNoob @Endranii

                              however mavor doesnt have 100% accuracy,

                              Mavor has at most 96% accuracy

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D Offline
                                Dorset
                                last edited by

                                If you are in a game where anyone builds 8 novax uncontested then you should be very happy when that game ends no matter what team you are on.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                • First post
                                  Last post