FAForever Forums
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Developers Iteration III of 2023

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
    138 Posts 33 Posters 279.0k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • veteranasheV Offline
      veteranashe
      last edited by

      Voting among the players would be the worst option

      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • S Offline
        snoog
        last edited by

        Sometimes I think Jip should just stop posting any news at all bc of all the shitposting he gets in return.

        People have been asking for years for the mobile factories to be fixed, he's doing it. And two of the them aren't ready yet. What the fuck is the problem with you guys? So much entitlement.

        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 7
        • P Offline
          Paralon @veteranashe
          last edited by

          @veteranashe so it might be a certain group of players

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Offline
            Paralon @snoog
            last edited by Paralon

            @snaggs did u ever play equilibrium? There was just the same solution but no one wanted to implement it in the game. The problem is that you can't release a product that isn't fully ready imho

            JipJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JipJ Offline
              Jip @Paralon
              last edited by

              @paralon said in Developers Iteration III of 2023:

              Very important and interesting changes, thank you for the work done. But I would like to clarify what is the need to update the work of mobile factories in parts, while temporarily removing them from the game for czar and mega. If you don't want to break user experience then why not just wait till everything is ready. I guess this is absolutely wrong approach, you can’t do changes like this because of development status, this is completely players experience breaking. You need to prove your point and make some voting among the players

              Have you tried the new implementation? I'd love to see the replay id where you did.

              Yesterday I did five sessions with five different people. You can find them on the vault:

              • https://replay.faforever.com/20660898
              • https://replay.faforever.com/20660351
              • https://replay.faforever.com/20660146
              • https://replay.faforever.com/20657299
              • https://replay.faforever.com/20657084

              cde886be-e560-4934-9c7d-0ca7fa809872-image.png

              Of course, people need to get used to the fact that the factory module is now a separate unit. But we can't get around that, it is just how the engine works. Once they realized that it was fine, and it worked the way they expected it to work. To sum it up:

              • You can (manually) select the factory module by clicking behind the out, outside of the unit. See also the screenshot
              • You can do what you can do with a normal factory: queue units, issue rally points, pause it, etc
              • Opponents or observers can not select or target the factory module, to them there is just a Fatboy / Tempest / etc
              • You can use any existing hotkey that interacts with factories to select / manage the factory modules
              • Pausing the main unit will also pause the factory module
              • The progress bar of the main unit is updated as units are built

              As I mentioned here in response to @magge the solution is of course not perfect yet. I'd love for it to be more complete, but it is not at this time. But calling it 'raw' is far from the truth.

              A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
              • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
              • P Offline
                Paralon @Jip
                last edited by

                @jip yep this is still very impressive improvement of the game. Perhaps not quite accurately expressed, I meant maybe we can wait with release new features before mega and czar will be ready? My point is this is wrong to remove some game mechanics for a while

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JipJ Offline
                  Jip
                  last edited by Jip

                  @Paralon The balance team happened to have a meeting and I asked their opinion. We've re-instated the Megalith the way it was, it can build but not move at the same time, like the current behavior in the release branch. Also adds in the standard Cybran drone fx for building. See also:

                  • https://github.com/FAForever/fa/pull/5367

                  With regards to the CZAR, the balance team agreed to wait with re-introducing the mobile factory aspect until the implementation is finished. It can still be used as a carrier.

                  I hope this settles it for you too @Ninrai .

                  And I agree with what @BlackYps wrote. Specifically the forums are often toxic towards contributors that do their best to improve the experience as they see fit. I too am here to improve the FAForever experience. I do that for more hours each week then I'd like to admit to. I've been doing that for more than two years now. I'm open to suggestions and discussions. But please, keep it civil and constructive. I'll respond in kind. Assumptions are the death of any discussion.

                  A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                  • P Offline
                    Paralon
                    last edited by Paralon

                    @jip thank you for response, never wanted to devalue your work at all. I would suggest edit those lines, because its kinda confusing:
                    The following units lose their mobile factory capabilities:
                    Megalith (Cybran Megabot)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JipJ Offline
                      Jip
                      last edited by

                      Adjusted it 👍 , I forgot about it 🙂

                      A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • veteranasheV Offline
                        veteranashe
                        last edited by

                        I believe, at least with the Fatboy, once built you will set a repeat queue of units and leave that part alone, you will just have to move around the rally point.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • XanoxisX Offline
                          Xanoxis @Jip
                          last edited by Xanoxis

                          @jip When I look at those pictures of new shaders, they look gorgeous, but like with all games that use repeating textures, I wonder if it's possible to improve the look of them on the zoom out? Are there any plans for making textures less visibly repeating, at least mostly for the ground?

                          Something like those methods - https://blog.unity.com/technology/procedural-stochastic-texturing-in-unity

                          Implementing some sort of 'noise' for those textures would not be costly, but improve the look of game a lot in the long run.

                          JipJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • JipJ Offline
                            Jip @Xanoxis
                            last edited by

                            Yes, there is an experimental shader written by @BlackYps that explores the possibilities to 'hide' the repetition. It is not production ready, but we hope to start a test trial later this year. I have no screenshots at the moment to show the results so far.

                            Other possibilities (outside of the shader) is to toy with mip maps and reduce the 'repeating' factors as you load in smaller and smaller mip maps. This is what Supreme Commander does with a lot of the stratum textures that ship with the game.

                            @xanoxis said in Developers Iteration III of 2023:

                            Implementing some sort of 'noise' for those textures would not be costly, but improve the look of game a lot in the long run.

                            We're limited by the old shader model (2.0) that the game uses, including an instruction (256) and texture read (16, I think) limit. That is why working on the shaders can be a struggle, all the modern and limitless shaders are out of our reach.

                            You sound like you have experience with shaders. Would you like to contribute? We could always use more help

                            A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                            • S Offline
                              Sycube @Jip
                              last edited by

                              @jip said in Developers Iteration III of 2023:

                              The following units lose their mobile factory capabilities:

                              CZAR (Aeon Experimental Carrier)

                              why to impoverished strategic options?

                              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C Offline
                                CocaineDiesel @Sycube
                                last edited by

                                @sycube

                                It's a temporary measure until it can be implemented.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JipJ Offline
                                  Jip
                                  last edited by Jip

                                  Updated the general features / bug fixes post to the latest status quo.

                                  The Wiki pages that help explain some of the more complicated hotkeys are finished. You can find them here:

                                  • https://wiki.faforever.com/en/Play/Game/Hotkeys/OrdersAdvanced
                                  • https://wiki.faforever.com/en/Play/Game/Hotkeys/OrdersQueueManipulation
                                  • https://wiki.faforever.com/en/Play/Game/Hotkeys/OrdersMouseContext

                                  The game links to these pages in the key bindings menu. Hopefully this can help players understand what these hotkeys can mean to their* play style

                                  A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                                  • JipJ Offline
                                    Jip
                                    last edited by

                                    @magge the hover-to-build behavior is now a UI mod that you can enable to have the same behavior. See also:

                                    5e24fddf-1391-4cbb-a984-b5962f2437cc-image.png

                                    A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • JipJ Offline
                                      Jip
                                      last edited by

                                      I've written a draft of the (in-game) changelog. For those that contributed, please give it a read. You can find it here:

                                      • https://forum.faforever.com/topic/6422/developers-iteration-iii-of-2023/7

                                      A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JipJ Jip referenced this topic on
                                      • Ctrl-KC Offline
                                        Ctrl-K
                                        last edited by

                                        Any chance of ringing feature return after assembly patch coming?

                                        “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where excellence is expected.”
                                        — Steve Jobs.
                                        My UI Mods
                                        Support me

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • JipJ Offline
                                          Jip
                                          last edited by

                                          Yes, assuming that it solves the performance problems 🙂

                                          A work of art is never finished, merely abandoned

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • maggeM Offline
                                            magge Global Moderator
                                            last edited by

                                            @Jip Found a small typo for in-game settings hotkey:

                                            11a4dce2-06d2-496b-8ea5-b48ed6e675bc-image.png

                                            wrong: ququed
                                            correct: queued

                                            Also, I read the changelog and checked with some spell checking and grammar tools. Quality is professional.

                                            Want to become a Moderator? || Open volunteer positions
                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post