• M28AI Devlog (v136)

    444
    17 Votes
    444 Posts
    458k Views
    maudlin27M
    @saver Anything like that I’d need a replay to assess as there will be competing logic: -Retreat to avoid damage from subs -Avoid a cycle of retreating and advancing all while taking damage without doing anything -Avoid making landfall to die to a superior force -Avoid overreacting to a small naval threat The logic will likely have room for improvement in specific scenarios
  • Mini27AI

    2
    7 Votes
    2 Posts
    205 Views
    maudlin27M
    V2 update - fixed a bug where attacking units wouldnt get new orders when their target was dead. Also updated the wiki with a diagram of how the logic works: https://wiki.faforever.com/en/Development/AI/AI-Modding#overview-of-mini27ais-logic
  • AI Development Guide and M27AI v74 Devlog

    214
    15 Votes
    214 Posts
    37k Views
    maudlin27M
    Not clear that it's M28 that's causing it, the mod list looks like it is quite long: info: MOD LIST SET TO: info: RNGAI (faf0863e-4c91-4bc0-ac2d-20e3f69432d5) info: AI-Swarm (a13ac591-b2d9-4d94-0285-3d4b3cce6b97) info: AllFactionsFixed (58c232c2-f7e8-4256-8892-85fbb9687a69) info: AI-Uveso (62e2j64a-AIUV-112-89465-146as555a8u3) info: M27AI (f27c55b4-v078-55b4-92b6-64398e75e23f) info: OOF ACU Death Sound (BBEFBDF1-3C21-4CD6-89EE-86EA42218C0C) info: Redux Strategic Icons Small (redux-icons-small-01) info: M28AI (fnewm028-v115-55b4-92b6-64398e7ge43f) This error appears a lot at the end of the log: warning: Unable to load texture: c:\programdata\faforever\gamedata\units.nx2\units\urb2302\urb2302_specteam.dds So it could be a graphical issue. My suggestion would be to turn off as many mods as possible and see if you still get the error, and also post that error/link to the log on the technical support forum in discord (or here) to see if anyone else has an idea what the issue would be.
  • AI-Swarm - AI Mod For FAForever

    Moved
    3
    5 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    maudlin27M
    A new version of the mod, AI-Swarm (Fixed) has been uploaded to the FAF vault. This is based on the latest release of AI-Swarm (v285) by Azraaa, with some fixes by Relent0r so that it works in FAF again.
  • AI-Uveso (v112) - AI mod for FAForever

    160
    8 Votes
    160 Posts
    28k Views
    DeribusD
    @romaman [image: 1708736196763-f29a11d0-97d2-40c2-96b9-f4ece7fa182c-image.png]
  • RCVII ~ 4v4 AI ~ Tournament Dev

    48
    4 Votes
    48 Posts
    4k Views
    FearghalF
    Updated the Header and the first few posts to be pertinent to the upcoming RCVII. Deleted many posts relating to the last 2 RC's, so... many of the comments by others, map appear out of context, to this upcoming tournament. Will start posting updates and maps on this forum in next few days. Any questions about the upcoming Tournament are welcome below. Thanks for feedback.
  • advanced AI not working in the latest patch.

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    219 Views
    MostLostNoobM
    @orangerobot Were you playing with any mods? In the Create Game screen, which Game Type did you have selected (FAF, FAF Beta Balance, FAF Develop or Nomads)? Also, please go to client > top left menu > Show logs folder > logs > sort by Date Modified. From there, drag/drop the most recent game log file (should be of the game that you experienced this issue in) into here so those that can help (not me) have that data to look at.
  • AI descriptions

    8
    1 Votes
    8 Posts
    622 Views
    R
    I believe Uveso updated his AI today, Swarm is currently waiting on the developer to update.
  • Monthly AI Tourney Series

    29
    11 Votes
    29 Posts
    4k Views
    G
    I am playing a lot on the dark heart so i can give some feedback, i am not sure though if those observations only apply to this map. I switched from M27 to M28 as ally because he stays in base with com and i avoid those early 5-15min deaths that ruin the game. 1v1 vs M27 is a different story though, as there he will be attacking u with com and it will be hard to defend + snipe him. So as far as M27, if i was doing things i would set a hard time limit as to how long commander is allowed outside the base. Snipes from 10 onwards are to easy and he mostly has no air cover. If you wonder far enough from base, it gives enemies plenty of time to make enough snipe tools even if you start straight for your base right away. I noticed that M27 and RNG, even in minute 30, they will occasionaly venture to middle of map, collect some mass, extractors .. again, i think i would set a hard limit and put commander to the safest place possible. The fact that M27 wonders around area marked with yellow makes me belive he thinks he is safe in the water. I would prefer him moved to the water behind the island, with enough AA on main island to hopefuly prevent any over island torp bomber attempts. M28 is as far as economy goes not far from M27, i even like the fact that he builds factories in remote mass extractor bases sometimes. But with that mass he seems to be less dangerous. But once base is built, you have a very reliable ally at home that will keep his base safe. 2 ideas that i had but i am not sure if its even possible to implement, i would have to look at the files myself. First is use of signals. For instance, even in best scenarios, something can go wrong and commander will maybe follow enemy engineer and wonder far away. It would be cool if you could use 1 of the 3 signals and that would move his com to that location. As an alternative, i see M27 and M28 greet eachother at the start of battle, maybe they could also listen to some of the ally advices, like, move com back to base, help me in my base, hold skies clear. That would simulate a real person ally to some degree. Keep up the good work and if you have any ideas of interesting scenarios i can simulate, let me know. So far i am enjoying those AI's i use more than real players. And my playing has improved a lot more than it did before where in 6v6 i did the always same predictable things and enemy also always was completely predictable and either killed you before you could learn anything or was so bad that it offered no learning experience. ps: i used M27, M28 and RNG in quite a few battles so far and had absolutely no tehnical problems, desync, lagging, etc. I did have issues with core game itself, mostly things like putting bug on patrol in the mid of base, only to see it follow a spy plane back to enemy base and get killed when i look elsewhere. Same with commander on patrol. Should be limited by how far from patrol area u can run after an unit before going back. Probably i am doing something wrong, using the wrong command. [image: 1689103631287-the_dark_heart_preview.jpg]
  • Support ACU Assist order code

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    420 Views
    UvesoU
    Well maybe the platoon builder has a template that is only using engineers, or Subcommander are excluded from the assist function. SACUs are excluded from the engineer platoons here: https://github.com/FAForever/fa/blob/deploy/fafdevelop/lua/AI/OpAI/BaseManagerPlatoonThreads.lua#L45 Also SACUs are not allowed to perma assist a factory: https://github.com/FAForever/fa/blob/deploy/fafdevelop/lua/AI/OpAI/BaseManagerPlatoonThreads.lua#L45 These need to be changed or those functions are useless for platoons with SACUs.
  • DilliDalli - 1v1 specialist AI

    13
    7 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    There's such a thing as too spicy!
  • Help with beginner AI development

    3
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    372 Views
    UvesoU
    @maudlin27 if you want to know what the AI is actual building and what platoonbuilder is used for it, then you could use my AI mod to debug this. If activated my mod provides the following debug outputs: DEBUG: AI Platoon names will show the name of the actual platoon on every unit. DEBUG: AI BuilderManager will print the actual ordered buildplatoon to the moho debug window ([F9]) [Edit] if you need help with debugging, just post your mod here or on discord and we will look at it.
  • AI Default Settings

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    801 Views
    S
    Good summary. A lot really has to do with both the AI's intentions with naval expansions - and the map makers understanding of how the AI interacts with the markers. Each AI can, and often does, have different parameters for WHEN to expand, and how far to expand. As a result, the experience can vary rather wildly. The AI developers have recently been talking about some logic to better understand what kind of naval investment is necessary, depending upon just how big a map is - and what % of the map is actually water. The idea being that the AI becomes aware that no matter what the markers may indicate - this map just isn't viable for naval work - or it's so significant that it should work much harder on naval.